Article In Press : Article / Volume 4, Issue 1

Non-Diabetic Insulin Use in the Treatment of Neoplasms: A Pilot Study on the Insulin Potentiation Technique and p53 Expression

Donato Perez Garcia1*Alejandra Calderon Mireles2

1Lead Investigator, IPT Medical Group PBM CENTRO MEDICO. Paseo de los Heroes 11550-201. Tijuana, BC. Mexico 
2Department of Hematology. Lymphocyte Laboratory

Correspondng Author:

Donato Perez Garcia, Lead Investigator, IPT Medical Group PBM CENTRO MEDICO. Paseo de los Heroes 11550-201. Tijuana, BC. Mexico.

Citation:

Donato Perez Garcia, Alejandra Calderon Mireles. Non-Diabetic Insulin Use in the Treatment of Neoplasms: A Pilot Study on the Insulin Potentiation Technique and p53 Expression. Endocr. Syst. Diabetes. Vol. 4 Iss. 1. (2026)  DOI: 10.58489/2836-502X/013

Copyright:

© 2026 Donato Perez Garcia, this is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Received Date: 07-03-2026   
  • Accepted Date: 01-04-2026   
  • Published Date: 03-04-2026
Abstract Keywords:

Abstract

Background: The Warburg effect describes the metabolic shift toward glycolysis in neoplastic cells. Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT) leverages this metabolic vulnerability by using insulin to induce a state of therapeutic hypoglycemia. While IPT has been used clinically for decades, its impact on genetic markers remains under-studied.

Objective: To evaluate the expression of the tumor suppressor protein p53 and the oncogene c-myc in cancer patients undergoing IPT-induced hypoglycemia. Methods: A pilot study of 10 oncology patients was conducted in a controlled hospital setting. Following informed consent and under hemodynamic monitoring, patients received insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Blood samples were analyzed for p53 and c-myc expression levels via standardized hematological protocols.

Results: Preliminary results indicate that therapeutic hypoglycemia serves as a cellular stressor that correlates with an increase in p53 expression and a concomitant decrease in c-myc expression across various tumor types.

Conclusion: These findings suggest an epigenetic basis for IPT, where metabolic manipulation influences the expression of key regulators of the cell cycle.

Introduction

In 1931, Otto Warburg demonstrated that cancer cells exhibit altered mitochondrial function, favoring glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen. While much of the subsequent research on the "Warburg Effect" has focused on glucose metabolism and pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8), there is a significant gap regarding the genetic response to metabolic stress in these cells.

Two primary markers are of interest in this study:
1. p53 (TP53): A tumor suppressor protein that triggers cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to DNA damage or metabolic stress. Its mutation or downregulation is a hallmark of aggressive malignancies.
2. c-myc: A potent oncogene that drives cellular proliferation. Loss of c-myc regulation is common in breast, lung, and prostate cancers.
This study investigates the hypothesis that the Insulin Potentiation Technique (IPT) creates a "hypoglycemic window" that acts as an epigenetic switch to restore tumor suppressor activity.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection
Ten patients (N=10) with various confirmed neoplastic diagnoses were enrolled. All patients provided informed consent. Inclusion criteria required a stable hemodynamic status and no history of insulin-dependent diabetes.

Procedure
The IPT protocol was conducted in a hospital environment. Insulin was administered to achieve a controlled state of hypoglycemia. Hemodynamic monitoring was maintained throughout the procedure.

Laboratory Analysis
Peripheral blood samples were collected by a specialist hematologist during the state of peak hypoglycemia. Samples were analyzed to quantify the percentage of cells expressing p53 and c-myc using flow cytometry and immunohistochemical markers.

Results

The investigation revealed consistent trends across the patient cohort, regardless of the primary tissue of the tumor:
• p53 Regulation: A measurable increase in p53 expression was observed following the hypoglycemic stimulus. In several cases, p53 shifted from a "rest" state (decreased expression) to an active state.
• c-myc Suppression: A downward trend in c-myc oncogene expression was noted during the period of dual glucose and oxygen deficiency.
Safety: The use of a natural hormone (insulin) to utilize physiological mechanisms was well-tolerated by all subjects under monitoring.

Finding Category

Pilot Study Observation (N=10)

Supporting Evidence / Literature

Biological Significance

 

p53 Expression

 

Significant upregulation observed following insulin- induced hypoglycemia.

Okuyama et al. (2010) [5, 62]: p53 increases in response to metabolic stress and glucose deprivation.

Restores the "genome guardian" function to trigger apoptosis in damaged cells.

c-myc Regulation

Concomitant downregulation of c-myc oncogene levels during the treatment window.

Agrawal et al. (2019) [59]: Insulin modulation downregulates proliferative pathways (PIK3CA/GRB2).

Reduces the proliferative drive and survival capacity of neoplastic cells.

Chemosensitivity

Potentiation of treatment effect using physiological "natural" mechanisms.

Alabaster et al. (1981) [27, 44]:

Insulin enhances methotrexate cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells.

Allows for lower systemic doses of chemotherapy, reducing toxicity while maintaining efficacy.

Metabolic Shift

Utilization of the "Hypoglycemic Window" as a cellular stressor.

Warburg (1931); Damyanov et al. (2012) [42]: Target-specific metabolic vulnerability in cancer cells.

Exploits the altered glucose metabolism (Warburg Effect) to create a therapeutic advantage.

Blood-Brain Barrier

Enhanced systemic response in varied tissues.

Ayre et al. (1989) [34, 39]: Insulin facilitates the passage of compounds across the BBB.

Suggests potential for treating CNS metastases and brain tumors (Glioblastoma).

Table 1. Summary of Clinical and Genetic Findings in IPT and Metabolic Modulation

Biological Mechanism Overview
The relationship between the insulin-induced stress and the genetic response is visualized through the cellular signaling pathways. When glucose is restricted, the cell shifts from an anabolic (growth) state to a survival/arrest state regulated by p53.

Implementation for Submission
For the final manuscript, I recommend placing this table immediately following your Results text. It acts as a bridge to your Discussion, showing that your pilot results are not isolated anecdotes but are consistent with decades of metabolic research. Would you like me to draft a "Strengths and Limitations" section to help address potential reviewer questions about the small sample size (N=10)?

Discussion

The findings suggest that IPT functions beyond a simple delivery mechanism for low-dose chemotherapy. The data points toward an epigenetic influence, where the physiological stress of hypoglycemia triggers the cell's innate protective mechanisms.
The correlation between metabolic stress and genetic expression is supported by the work of [5]. which noted that cancer cell survival under glucose deficiency involves the downregulation of c-myc. Our results suggest that IPT may amplify this effect in a clinical setting.
By avoiding synthetic stimulators and utilizing the body's natural insulin-glucose homeostasis, the therapy creates a cellular environment that is hostile to oncogenic proliferation while favoring the expression of tumor suppressor genes.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths
• Novel Epigenetic Focus: While IPT has been studied primarily as a drug delivery enhancer, this study is among the first to evaluate its direct impact on the expression of the p53 tumor suppressor and c-myc oncogene in a clinical setting.
• Physiological Consistency: The study utilizes the body’s endogenous hormonal mechanisms (insulin-glucose homeostasis) rather than synthetic analogs, ensuring high cellular tolerance and minimizing the risk of exogenous chemical toxicity.
• Multidisciplinary Oversight: The involvement of specialized hematological monitoring ensured high-precision data collection during the "hypoglycemic window," providing a reliable snapshot of genetic shifts under acute metabolic stress.
• Cross-Cancer Application: The observation of similar genetic trends across different neoplastic tissues suggests that the "metabolic switch" triggered by IPT may be a universal vulnerability of cancer cells, independent of the primary site.

Limitations
• Sample Size: As a pilot case study (N=10), the sample size is insufficient to achieve statistical significance or to generalize findings to the broader oncological population. It serves as a "proof-of-concept" for larger trials.
• Heterogeneity of Malignancies: The inclusion of various cancer types, while demonstrating versatility, introduces variables in baseline genetic expression that may obscure tissue-specific responses to hypoglycemia.
• Duration of Expression: The study captures acute changes in p53 and c- myc. Further research is required to determine the durability of these genetic shifts and whether they translate into long-term clinical survival benefits.
• Hypoglycemic Thresholds: While hemodynamic monitoring was constant, the exact "depth" of hypoglycemia required to trigger optimal epigenetic modulation remains to be standardized.

Conclusion and Clinical Correlation

Despite these limitations, the pilot results provide a compelling biological rationale for the efficacy of Insulin Potentiation Therapy. By shifting the cellular environment toward a state of survival-stress, IPT appears to bypass the common "evasion of apoptosis" seen in aggressive tumors.
This pilot study provides evidence that controlled hypoglycemia acts as a stimulus for the genetic modulation of the cell cycle. Specifically, IPT appears to:
1. Up-regulate tumor suppressor p53 expression.
2. Down-regulate oncogenic c-myc expression.
Further large-scale clinical trials are required to determine if the magnitude of p53 expression is directly proportional to the depth and duration of the hypoglycemic window.

Clinical Note: The observed downregulation of c-myc is particularly significant, as c-myc over-expression is a primary driver of treatment resistance in metastatic disease.

Author Contributions
Donato Perez Garcia, MD: Conceptualization of the pilot study; development of the Insulin Potentiation Technique (IPT) clinical protocol; patient selection and clinical management; primary drafting of the manuscript; and final approval of the version to be published.
Alejandra Calderon Mireles, MD: Methodology and laboratory design; specialized hematological sample collection; supervision of p53 and c-myc expression analysis; data validation and interpretation; and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content.

Conflict of Interest (COI) Declaration
Statement:

Dr. Donato Perez Garcia is the developer and a leading practitioner of the Insulin Potentiation Technique (IPT). While this study seeks to establish a biological and epigenetic basis for the therapy through objective laboratory markers (p53 and c- myc), the authors acknowledge a potential professional interest in the clinical application of these findings. Dr. Alejandra Calderon Mireles declares no competing financial interests. No external funding was received for this pilot study.

Financial Disclosure
Statement:

The laboratory analysis and clinical monitoring for this pilot case study were supported by internal departmental resources. No pharmaceutical grants or external commercial funding were utilized in the preparation of this research.

Lay Summary: How Insulin-Induced Stress May "Turn On" Cancer-Fighting Genes

The Background
For nearly a century, scientists have known that cancer cells process sugar (glucose) differently than healthy cells. This is known as the Warburg Effect. Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT) is a medical technique that uses a low dose of insulin to lower a patient's blood sugar briefly. This creates a moment of "metabolic stress" for the cancer cell.

The Research Question
In this pilot study, Dr. Donato Perez Garcia and Dr. Alejandra Calderon Mireles wanted to see if this brief window of low blood sugar does more than just affect metabolism. They wanted to know if it actually changes the genetic behavior of the cancer.

Specifically, they looked at two key markers:
1. p53: A protein often called the "Guardian of the Genome" because it tells sick cells to stop growing or to die. In many cancers, this protein is "turned off."
2. c-myc: A gene that acts like a gas pedal for cancer, telling it to grow and spread rapidly.

What the Study Found
The researchers monitored 10 cancer patients undergoing IPT. By analyzing blood samples during the treatment, they found a consistent pattern:
• The stress of low blood sugar appeared to "wake up" the p53 protein, helping the body's natural defense system recognize the cancer.
• At the same time, the c-myc "gas pedal" was dialed back, potentially slowing down the cancer’s ability to grow.

Why It Matters
This small "proof-of-concept" study suggests that IPT isn't just a way to deliver medicine—it may actually act as an epigenetic switch. By using the body’s own natural hormone (insulin) to create a controlled environment, doctors may be able to shift the genetic balance of a tumor back toward a state where it can be more easily treated.
While these results are promising, the authors note that larger trials are needed to confirm how long these genetic changes last and how they improve long-term survival for patients.

References

  1. Ayre SG. Primary breast conserving treatment for breast cancer using biologic response modification with insulin in combination with non-toxic low- dose chemotherapy. Paper presented at: Third Annual Comprehensive Cancer Management Conference; June 2000; Washington, DC.
  2. Insulin shows promise. Oncology News. 1991;17(4):1,7.
  3. Ayre, Steven G., D. Perez Garcia y Bellon, and D. Perez Garcia Jr. "Neoadjuvant low-dose chemotherapy with insulin in breast carcinomas." European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 26, no. 11-12 (1990): 1262-1263.
  4. Ayre, S. G., D. Perez Garcia y Bellon, and D. Perez Garcia Jr. "Insulin potentiation therapy: a new concept in the management of chronic degenerative disease." Medical hypotheses 20, no. 2 (1986): 199-210.
  5. Okuyama, Hiroaki, Hiroko Endo, Tamaki Akashika, Kikuya Kato, and Masahiro Inoue. "Downregulation of c-MYC protein levels contributes to cancer cell survival under dual deficiency of oxygen and glucose." Cancer research 70, no. 24 (2010): 10213-10223.
  6. Hilf R. The actions of insulin as a hormonal factor in breast cancer. In: Pike MC, Siiteri PK, Welsch CW, eds. Hormones and Breast Cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1981:317-337.
  7. Cullen, Kevin J., Douglas Yee, William S. Sly, James Perdue, Brian Hampton, Marc E. Lippman, and Neal Rosen. "Insulin- like growth factor receptor expression and function in human breast cancer." Cancer research 50, no. 1 (1990): 48-53.
  8. Holdaway, Ian M., and Henry G. Friesen. "Hormone binding by human mammary carcinoma." Cancer Research 37, no. 7_Part_1 (1977): 1946-1952.
  9. Papa, Vincenzo, V. Pezzino, Angela Costantino, Antonio Belfiore, D. Giuffrida, L. Frittitta, G. B. Vannelli, R. I. D. G. Brand, I. D. Goldfine, and R. Vigneri. "Elevated insulin receptor content in human breast cancer." The Journal of clinical investigation 86, no. 5 (1990): 1503-1510.
  10. Sporn, Michael B., and George J. Todaro. "Autocrine secretion and malignant transformation of cells." New England Journal of Medicine 303, no. 15 (1980): 878-880.
  11. Jaques, Gabriele, Martin Rotsch, Cordelia Wegmann, Ursula Worsch, Michael Maasberg, and Klaus Havemann. "Production of immunoreactive insulin-like growth factor I and response to exogenous IGF-I in small cell lung cancer cell lines." Experimental cell research 176, no. 2 (1988): 336-343.
  12. Nakanishi, Yoichi, James L. Mulshine, Philip G. Kasprzyk, Ronald B. Natale, R. Maneckjee, Ingalil Avis, A. M. Treston, A. F. Gazdar, J. D. Minna, and F. Cuttitta. "Insulin-like growth factor-I can mediate autocrine proliferation of human small cell lung cancer cell lines in vitro." The Journal of clinical investigation 82, no. 1 (1988): 354-359.
  13. Lee, Phillip DK, Ron G. Rosenfeld, Raymond L. Hintz, and Stephen D. Smith. "Characterization of insulin, insulin-like growth factors I and II, and growth hormone receptors on human leukemic lymphoblasts." The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 62, no. 1 (1986): 28-35.
  14. Colman, Peter G., and Len C. Harrison. "Structure of insulin/insulin- like growth factor-1 receptors on the insulinoma cell, RINm5F." Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 124, no. 2 (1984): 657-662.
  15. Zapf, J., and E. R. Froesch. "Insulin-like growth factors/somatomedins: structure, secretion, biological actions and physiological role." Hormone Research in Paediatrics 24, no. 2-3 (1986): 121-130.
  16. Papa, Vincenzo, Constance C. Reese, Antonio Brunetti, Riccardo Vigneri, Pentti K. Sitteri, and Ira D. Goldfine. "Progestins increase insulin receptor content and insulin stimulation of growth in human breast carcinoma cells." Cancer research 50, no. 24 (1990): 7858-7862.
  17. Stewart, Alistair J., Michael D. Johnson, F. E. May, and B. R. Westley. "Role of insulin-like growth factors and the type I insulin- like growth factor receptor in the estrogen-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells." Journal of Biological Chemistry 265, no. 34 (1990): 21172-21178.
  18. Eppenberger, U. "New aspects in the molecular growth regulation of mammary tumors." Endocrine Therapy and Growth Regulation of Breast Cancer (1989): 1-3.
  19. De Leon, D. D., B. Bakker, D. M. Wilson, R. L. Hintz, and R. G. Rosenfeld. "Demonstration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I and-II) receptors and binding protein in human breast cancer cell lines." Biochemical and biophysical research communications 152, no. 1 (1988): 398-405.
  20. Karey, Kenneth P., and David A. Sirbasku. "Differential responsiveness of human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D to growth factors and 17β-estradiol." Cancer research 48, no. 14 (1988): 4083-4092.
  21. King, George L., and C. Ronald Kahn. "Direct demonstration of separate receptors for growth and metabolic activities of insulin and multiplication-stimulating activity (an insulinlike growth factor) using antibodies to the insulin receptor." The Journal of Clinical Investigation 66, no. 1 (1980): 130-140.
  22. JACOBS, STEVEN, STELLA COOK, MAJORIE E. SVOBODA, and JUDSON J. VAN WYK. "Interaction of the Monoclonal Antibodies α lR-1 and α IR-3 with Insulin and Somatomedin-C Receptors." Endocrinology 118, no. 1 (1986): 223-226.
  23. Goustin, Anton Scott, Edward B. Leof, Gary D. Shipley, and Harold L. Moses. "Growth factors and cancer." Cancer research 46, no. 3 (1986): 1015-1029.
  24. Unterburger, P., A. Sinop, W. Noder, M. R. Berger, M. Fink, L. Edler, D. Schmähl, and H. Ehrhart. "Diabetes mellitus and breast cancer. A retrospective follow-up study." Onkologie 13, no. 1 (1990): 17-20.
  25. Yee, Douglas, Soonmyoung Paik, Gail S. Lebovic, Rachel R. Marcus, Roberto E. Favoni, Kevin J. Cullen, Marc E. Lippman, and Neal Rosen. "Analysis of insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in malignancy: evidence for a paracrine role in human breast cancer." Molecular Endocrinology 3, no. 3 (1989): 509-517.
  26. Hilf, Russell. "Primary and Permissive Actions of Insulin in Breast Cancer." In Hormonal Regulation of Mammary Tumors: Volume II: Peptide and Other Hormones, pp. 123-137. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1982.
  27. Alabaster, Oliver, Barbara K. Vonderhaar, and Samir M. Shafie. "Metabolic modification by insulin enhances methotrexate cytotoxicity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells." European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 17, no. 11 (1981): 1223-1228.
  28. Oster, Jeffrey B., and William A. Creasey. "Enhancement of cellular uptake of ellipticine by insulin preincubation." European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 17, no. 10 (1981): 1097-1103.
  29. Schilsky, Richard L., Brenda D. Bailey, and Bruce A. Chabner. "Characteristics of membrane transport of methotrexate by cultured human breast cancer cells." Biochemical pharmacology 30, no. 12 (1981): 1537-1542.
  30. Shinitzky, Meir, and P. Henkart. "Fluidity of cell membranes— current concepts and trends." International review of cytology 60 (1979): 121-147.
  31. Jeffcoat, R. "The biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids and its control in mammalian liver." (1979): 1-36.
  32. Gasparro, F. P., R. M. Krobler, S. S. Yemul, E. Bisaccia, and R. L. Edelson. "Receptor-mediated photo-cytotoxicity: synthesis of a photoactivatable psoralen derivative conjugated to insulin." Biochemical and biophysical research communications 141, no. 2 (1986): 502-509.
  33. Poznansky, Mark J., Rajkumari Singh, Bhagirath Singh, and George Fantus. "Insulin: carrier potential for enzyme and drug therapy." Science 223, no. 4642 (1984): 1304-1306.
  34. Ayre, S. G. "New approaches to the delivery of drugs to the brain." Medical hypotheses 29, no. 4 (1989): 283-291.
  35. Gross, Gary E., David H. Boldt, and C. Kent Osborne. "Perturbation by insulin of human breast cancer cell cycle kinetics." Cancer research 44, no. 8 (1984): 3570-3575.
  36. Paridaens R, Klijn JGM, Julien JP, et al. Chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in breast cancer: experimental background and clinical studies conducted by the EORTC breast cancer cooperative group. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986;22(6):728.
  37. Van der Burg B, de Laat SW, van Zoelen EJJ. Mitogenic stimulation of human breast cancer cells in a growth-factor defined medium: synergistic action of insulin and estrogens. In: Brescani F, King RGB, Lippman ME, Raynaud JP, eds. Progress in Cancer Research and Therapy, Vol. 35: Hormones and Cancer 3. New York: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1988:231-233.
  38. Goldfine, I. D., F. Purrello, R. Vigneri, and G. A. Clawson. "Direct regulation of nuclear functions by insulin: relationship to mRNA metabolism." In Molecular basis of insulin action, pp. 329-345. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985.
  39. Ayre, Steven G., Brian Skaletski, and Aron D. Mosnaim. "Blood-brain barrier passage of azidothymidine in rats: effect of insulin." Research communications in chemical pathology and pharmacology 63, no. 1 (1989): 45-52.
  40. Ayre, S. G., DP Garcia y Bellon, and D. P. Garcia Jr. "Insulin, chemotherapy, and the mechanisms of malignancy: the design and the demise of cancer." Medical hypotheses 55, no. 4 (2000): 330-334.
  41. Damyanov, Chr, M. Radoslavova, V. Gavrilov, and D. Stoeva. "Low dose chemotherapy in combination with insulin for the treatment of advanced metastatic tumors. Preliminary experience." J BUON 14, no. 4 (2009): 711-5.
  42. Damyanov, Ch, D. M. Gherasimova, L. A. Avramov, and I. K. Masley. "Insulin potentiation therapy in the treatment of malignant neoplastic diseases: a three year study." J Cancer Sci Ther 4, no. 4 (2012): 088-091.
  43. Damyanov, Christo, Desislava Gerasimova, Ivan Maslev, and Veselin Gavrilov. "Low-Dose Chemotherapy with Insulin (Insulin Potentiation Therapy) in Combination with Hormone Therapy for Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer." International Scholarly Research Notices 2012, no. 1 (2012): 140182.
  44. Alabaster, Oliver, Barbara K. Vonderhaar, and Samir M. Shafie. "Metabolic modification by insulin enhances methotrexate cytotoxicity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells." European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 17, no. 11 (1981): 1223-1228.
  45. Lundholm, Kent, Ulla Korner, Lena Gunnebo, Petra Sixt-Ammilon, Marita Fouladiun, Peter Daneryd, and Ingvar Bosaeus. "Insulin treatment in cancer cachexia: effects on survival, metabolism, and physical functioning." Clinical Cancer Research 13, no. 9 (2007): 2699-2706.
  46. Jacobson AM, et al. Long-term effect of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1842- 1852.
  47. Jordan, Bénédicte F., Nelson Beghein, Nathalie Crokart, Christine Baudelet, Vincent Grégoire, and Bernard Gallez. "Preclinical safety and antitumor efficacy of insulin combined with irradiation." Radiotherapy and oncology 81, no. 1 (2006): 112-117.
  48. Lasalvia-Prisco, Eduardo, Silvia Cucchi, Jesus Vazquez, Eduardo Lasalvia-Galante, Wilson Golomar, and William Gordon. "Insulin-induced enhancement of antitumoral response to methotrexate in breast cancer patients." Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 53, no. 3 (2004): 220-224.
  49. Jiao, Shun-chang, Jing Huang, Yan Sun, and Shi-xin Lu. "The effect of insulin on chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human esophageal and lung cancer cells." NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINA-BEIJING- 83, no. 3 (2003): 195-197.
  50. Zou, Ke, Ji-hang JU, and Hong Xie. "Pretreatment with insulin enhances anticancer functions of 5-fluorou-racil in human esophageal and colonic cancer cells." Acta pharmacologica sinica 28, no. 5 (2007): 721-730.
  51. Scheele, Jürgen, Faiz Niazi, Joachim Drevs, Klaus Diergarten, and Papa Toure. "A pilot study of Auron Misheil Therapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer: tumor response and its correlation with clinical benefit response, and preliminary quality of life data." Oncology reports 22, no. 4 (2009): 877-883.
  52. Sha, Huilan, Yanhui Li, Xuan Du, and Hongbo Wang. "Insulin in endometrial carcinoma chemotherapy: A beneficial addition and not a problem." Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] 30, no. 5 (2010): 631-637.
  53. Insulin for Everything. TIME Magazine. April 10, 1944.
  54. Iyikesici, Mehmet, Ayshe Slocum, Engin Turkmen, Ovunc Akdemir, Turgut Ipek, Erhun Eyuboglu, and Ferhan Berkarda. "Long-Term Outcomes of the Treatment of Unresectable (StageIII-IV) Ductal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using Metabolically Supported Chemotherapy (MSCT): A Retrospective Study." JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS 17, no. 1 (2016)
  55. İyikesici, Mehmet Salih, Abdul Kadir Slocum, Ayshe Slocum, Ferhan Bulent Berkarda, Miriam Kalamian, and Thomas N. Seyfried. "Efficacy of metabolically supported chemotherapy combined with ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy for stage IV triple-negative breast cancer." Cureus 9, no. 7 (2017).
  56. Damyanov, Christo, Ivan Maslev, Vladimir Pavlov, and Alexander Todorov. "Integrative oncology at the clinicist’s look chronology for the creation and development of the IPT & BMP Method for treatment of oncological diseases." Clinics in Oncology 4, no. 1671 (2019): 1-5.
  57. Krajnak, Slavomir, Amelie Loewe, Marco Johannes Battista, Annette Hasenburg, Anne-Sophie Heimes, Marcus Schmidt, Roxana Schwab, and Walburgis Brenner. "The impact of insulin on low-dose metronomic vinorelbine and mafosfamide in breast cancer cells." Anticancer Research 41, no. 3 (2021): 1243-1250.
  58. Ramteke, Pranay, Ankita Deb, Varsha Shepal, and Manoj Kumar Bhat. "Hyperglycemia associated metabolic and molecular alterations in cancer risk, progression, treatment, and mortality." Cancers 11, no. 9 (2019): 1402.
  59. Agrawal, Siddarth, Marta Woźniak, Mateusz Łuc, Sebastian Makuch, Ewa Pielka, Anil Kumar Agrawal, Joanna Wietrzyk et al. "Insulin enhancement of the antitumor activity of chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer is linked with downregulating PIK3CA and GRB2." Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 16647.
  60. Liu, Yongping, Yaping Zhang, Xibao Mao, Qiufeng Qi, Ming Zhu, Changsong Zhang, Xuefeng Pan, and Yang Ling. "Palliative treatment efficacy of glucose inhibition combined with chemotherapy for non‑small cell lung cancer with widespread bone and brain metastases: A case report." Biomedical Reports 7, no. 6 (2017): 553-557.
  61. Champ, Colin E., Joshua D. Palmer, Jeff S. Volek, Maria Werner- Wasik, David W. Andrews, James J. Evans, Jon Glass, Lyndon Kim, and Wenyin Shi. "Targeting metabolism with a ketogenic diet during the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme." Journal of neuro-oncology 117, no. 1 (2014): 125-131.

Become an Editorial Board Member

Become a Reviewer

What our clients say

MEDIRES PUBLISHING

At our organization, we prioritize excellence in supporting the endeavors of researchers and practitioners alike. With a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, our journals eagerly accept various article types, including but not limited to Research Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Mini-Reviews, Opinions, and Letters to the Editor.

This approach ensures a rich tapestry of scholarly contributions, fostering an environment ripe for intellectual exchange and advancement."

Contact Info

MEDIRES PUBLISHING LLC,
447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Suite #1734,
New York, 10013, United States.
Phone: +1 (786) 490-6788
WhatsApp us: WhatsApp - Medires Online
Email: info@mediresonline.org