Current Issue : Article / Volume 3, Issue 1

The Significance and Protection of the Skin Barrier in Newborn Care

Birgul Livaoglu Say*1

¹Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya Education and Training Hospital, Alanya-07450, Turkey

Correspondng Author:

Birgul Livaoglu Say, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya Education and Training Hospital, Alanya-07450, Turkey

Citation:

Birgul Livaoglu Say. The Significance and Protection of the Skin Barrier in Newborn Care. Skin. Dermatol. Res. Vol. 3 Iss. 1 (2025). DOI: 10.58489/2836-3604/006

Copyright:

© 2025 Birgul Livaoglu Say, this is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Received Date: 30-10-2025   
  • Accepted Date: 27-11-2025   
  • Published Date: 01-12-2025
Abstract Keywords:

Newborn skin barrier, Stratum corneum, Emollients, preterm infants, Transepidermal water loss, Skin microbiome

Abstract

The newborn skin barrier undergoes significant structural and functional changes during the transition from the intrauterine to extrauterine environment. This review examines the unique characteristics of neonatal skin, particularly in preterm infants, focusing on stratum corneum development, barrier function, and its implications for clinical care. We discuss the current evidence regarding routine emollient use in both term and preterm infants, analyzing various formulations and their effects on barrier integrity, infection risk, and potential neurodevelopmental outcomes. The emerging understanding of the skin-brain axis and microbiome interactions highlights the complexity of neonatal skin care beyond simple barrier protection. Based on the current evidence, we provide recommendations for evidence-based skin care practices that support natural barrier maturation while minimizing potential adverse effects.

Introduction

The newborn skin is a dynamic organ that undergoes continuous adaptation during the critical transition from a protected intrauterine environment to the external world. This transition requires rapid structural and functional maturation to establish an effective barrier against environmental challenges, while maintaining essential physiological functions.

Structural and Functional Characteristics of Newborn Skin

The skin of both term and preterm infants exhibited distinct differences from adult skin. The stratum corneum (SC), the outermost protective layer, is up to 30% thinner than that in adults, and this difference is particularly pronounced in preterm infants [1]. Corneocytes are smaller, with accelerated cell turnover, and the keratinization process remains incomplete. The dermal-epidermal junction shows reduced undulation, particularly in preterm infants, creating a vulnerability to mechanical trauma. In infants born before 28 weeks of gestation, the SC may be extremely thin or absent, resulting in markedly elevated transepidermal water loss (TEWL). TEWL rates demonstrate clear gestational age dependency: approximately 75 g/m²/h at 23 weeks, 45 g/m²/h at 26 weeks, and 17 g/m²/h at 29 weeks, compared to 5-8 g/m²/h in term infants [2]. Complete SC development may require up to nine weeks postpartum in very preterm infants [3]. Vernix caseosa, comprising 80% water along with lipids and proteins, provides crucial protection at birth. This substance creates a hydrophobic barrier, exhibits antimicrobial properties, and facilitates acid-mantle formation. Its preservation is particularly important in preterm infants, who typically have reduced vernix coverage [4]. 

Barrier Integrity and Health Implications

The skin barrier serves multiple critical functions, including regulation of water loss, protection against mechanical trauma, prevention of pathogen entry, thermoregulation, and immunological surveillance. Compromised barrier integrity leads to serious complications, particularly in preterm infants, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, increased infection risk, and thermal instability. Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population [5].

Postnatal Adaptation and Maturation

The immediate postnatal period involves rapid adaptation from a liquid to a gaseous microbe-rich environment. Skin surface pH transitions from near-neutral (6.0-7.5) at birth to acidic levels (5.0-5.5) within the first week, establishing the protective “acid mantle” [6]. This acidification process may be delayed in preterm infants, particularly under high humidity incubator conditions. Barrier maturation exhibits distinct patterns. In term infants, TEWL stabilizes rapidly within days and remains stable during the first two years [7]. Stratum corneum hydration may exceed adult levels between 3-12 months, although the water retention capacity remains low [7-8]. Sebum production, which was initially high due to maternal hormonal influences, decreased dramatically after 3-6 months. Barrier lipids, including ceramides and free fatty acids, remain at lower levels than those in adults during infancy, similar to natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) [7-9].

The Skin-Brain Axis and Neurodevelopmental Interactions

Neonatal skin functions as a neurodevelopmental interface, equipped with sensory receptors and components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [10]. Growing evidence has linked skin barrier dysfunction with neurodevelopmental outcomes. Chronic inflammation and stress responses triggered by barrier disruption may influence neurodevelopmental trajectory. Epidemiological associations between atopic dermatitis and neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD and autism spectrum disorder, have broader implications for skin health [11]. The microbiota-gut-skin-brain axis represents a complex communication network that influences immune development and potentially neurodevelopmental processes [12-14]. Skin care practices affecting microbiome composition may have far-reaching consequences beyond the local barrier function.

Clinical Guidelines for Neonatal Skin Care

Current International Recommendations

Major health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and various national pediatric associations have published guidelines for neonatal skin care [15-17]. These emphasize preserving the natural barrier function while minimizing infection risk through appropriate cleansing and moisturizing practices.

Bathing and Cleansing Practices

The WHO recommends delaying the first bath for at least 24 h or a minimum of 6 h if earlier bathing is necessary [18]. The bathing frequency should be limited to several times weekly, with a brief duration (5-10 minutes) and water temperature of 35-37°C. When cleansers are used, they should be neutral to slightly acidic (5.5-7.0), fragrance-free, and without potential irritants [19-21].

Emollient Use in Healthy Term Infants

Recent large-scale randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have contradicted earlier promising findings regarding the routine prophylactic emollient use for atopic dermatitis prevention. Current evidence demonstrates no preventive benefit and suggests a potential increased risk of skin infections and food allergies [22-24]. Therefore, routine prophylactic emollient use is not recommended in healthy term infants. Emollients should be reserved for treating specific conditions such as dryness or scaling.

Emollient Use in Preterm Infants

However, evidence regarding emollient use in preterm infants remains inconclusive. Studies in low- and middle-income countries suggest potential benefits, including reduced infection and mortality rates, particularly with plant-based oils [25]. However, studies in high-income settings have not demonstrated clear benefits and suggest a possible increased risk of infection in extremely low birth weight infants [10,15,25,27]. The WHO provides conditional recommendations for emollient use in preterm infants, emphasizing the need for individualized assessment and further research.

Emollient Formulations: Scientific Evidence

Formulation Types and Mechanisms

Emollients function through different mechanisms: occlusives create physical barriers that reduce TEWL, humectants draw water to increase hydration, and emollients soften the skin through lipid integration [28-32]. Ointments provide maximum occlusion, but may feel greasy. Creams and lotions offer improved cosmetic acceptability, but require preservatives that may cause irritation.

Specific Ingredients and Their Effects

Physiological Lipids: Ceramides, cholesterol, and free fatty acids are essential barrier components. While theoretically beneficial, high-quality evidence supporting the routine use of ceramide-containing products in healthy newborns remains limited [33-35]. Petrolatum and mineral oils provide effective occlusion with minimal allergenic potential. White petrolatum remains a recommended and affordable option despite theoretical infection concerns in preterm infants [36].

Plant-Based Oils: Efficacy varies significantly with fatty acid composition.

• Sunflower seed oil (high linoleic acid) shows promise in reducing TEWL and infection risk, particularly in resource-limited settings [37-39].

• Coconut oil demonstrates antimicrobial properties and potential growth benefits [40].

• Olive oil (high oleic acid) may disrupt barrier function and is not recommended [38-39].

• Mustard oil causes irritation and should be avoided [41].

Additional Ingredients: Fragrances, harsh preservatives, alkaline soaps, and alcohols should be avoided. Even “natural” plant extracts may cause sensitization [42-48]. The alt text for a table containing skincare recommendations for newborns could be: “Table 1 summarizes the recommended skincare practices for newborns, including the types of cleansers and frequencies of bathing for optimal skin health.

Area Recommendation Details and rationale

1. Cleansing:

Gentle cleansers

Use gentle, soap free/sulfate free, fragrance free, hypoallergenic

cleansers formulated near physiological pH (~ 5.5).

 

Avoid harsh soaps

Avoid harsh soaps/detergents that strip surface lipids, precipitate xerosis, and irritant dermatitis.

2. Bathing:

 

Frequency

Limit to 2–3 times per week unless visibly soiled. Prefer lukewarm

water; keep baths brief (5–10 min) and pat skin dry afterward.

3. Moisturization

 

 

Emollients

Apply bland emollients immediately after bathing (the “3 minute rule”). Favor fragrance-free, hypoallergenic products containing ceramides, hyaluronic acid, or glycerin, a thin layer of petrolatum/ lanolin, can reinforce the barrier. Use at least once daily, more frequently with dryness.

4. Diaper area care

 

Frequent cloth changes.

Diapers are changed frequently to minimize exposure to moisture and irritants. For each change, a thin barrier layer (e.g., zinc oxide or petrolatum) was applied. Cleanse with alcohol and fragrance-free wipes or warm water and cotton.

5. Clothing

 

 

Soft, breathable fabrics.

Dress infants in soft, breathable fabrics (e.g., cotton) to reduce friction/irritation. Avoid overdressing; use light layers appropriate to ambient temperature to prevent sweating and overheating.

6.Environmental

control

 

 

Humidity

Maintain moderate indoor humidity (~40–60%) to mitigate skin dryness, maintain room temperature within a comfortable range, and avoid thermal extremes that compromise the barrier integrity.

7. Sun protection

 

 

Shadow and clothing

Prioritize shade and protective clothing. For infants ≥6 months, use broad spectrum, water resistant sunscreen SPF ≥30 with mineral filters (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide); apply 15–20 minutes before exposure and reapply every 2 hours or after water/sweat- ing. For <6 months, rely on shade/clothing; if necessary, use minimal amounts of mineral sunscreen on limited exposed areas with clinician guidance.

8. Special considerations

Atopic tendency, prematurity

In infants with atopic predisposition or prematurity, adopt gentler cleansing and consistent emollient therapy and seek dermatology input for suspected eczema flares.

Table 1: Practical recommendations for newborn and infant skin care.

Efficacy and safety evaluation

Barrier Function Effects

Emollients generally reduce TEWL and increase hydration, although their effects vary by formulation. Evidence suggests that certain skincare regimens may interfere with natural postnatal barrier maturation [18-21]. Safety Considerations Irritation and Sensitization: Newborn skin shows increased sensitivity to chemicals. The selection of products without fragrances, alcohols, or harsh preservatives is critical [43]. Infection Risk: Evidence remains conflicting, particularly for preterm infants. The benefits observed in resource-limited settings contrast with neutral or negative findings in high-resource NICU [3-15-37-49]. 

Microbiome Effects

 Emollients influence microbial colonization patterns through modification of pH, moisture, and lipid content. The long-term implications remain under investigation [46-50-52].

Conclusions and Recommendations

The neonatal skin barrier is a complex and dynamic system that requires careful consideration in clinical care.

Current evidence supports the following:

1. Minimal intervention for healthy term infants, avoiding routine prophylactic emollient use

2. Individualized assessment for preterm infants, considering gestational age, clinical condition, and care setting

3. When emollients are indicated, selection of simple, well-tolerated formulations (petrolatum, appropriate plant oils)

4. Avoidance of products containing fragrances, harsh preservatives, or potentially sensitizing ingredients

5. Recognition that skin care practices may influence not only barrier function but also microbiome development and potentially neurodevelopmental outcomes. Future research should focus on optimizing care strategies that support natural barrier maturation while minimizing adverse effects, particularly in vulnerable preterm populations.

References

  1. Stamatas, Georgios N., Janeta Nikolovski, Michael A. Luedtke, Nikiforos Kollias, and Benjamin C. Wiegand. “Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level.” Pediatric dermatology 27, no. 2 (2010): 125-131.
  2. Kalia, Yogeshvar N., Lourdes B. Nonato, Carolyn H. Lund, and Richard H. Guy. “Development of skin barrier function in premature infants.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 111, no. 2 (1998): 320-326.
  3. Nishijima, Koji, Makoto Yoneda, Takayoshi Hirai, Koichi Takakuwa, and Takayuki Enomoto. “Biology of the vernix caseosa: A review.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 45, no. 11 (2019): 2145-2149.
  4. Shane, Andi L., Pablo J. Sánchez, and Barbara J. Stoll. “Neonatal sepsis.” The lancet 390, no. 10104 (2017): 1770-1780.
  5. Fluhr, Joachim W., Jack Kao, Sung K. Ahn, Kenneth R. Feingold, Peter M. Elias, and Mahendra Jain. “Generation of free fatty acids from phospholipids regulates stratum corneum acidification and integrity.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 117, no. 1 (2001): 44-51
  6. Telofski, Lorena S., A. Peter Morello III, M. Catherine Mack Correa, and Georgios N. Stamatas. “The infant skin barrier: can we preserve, protect, and enhance the barrier?.” Dermatology research and practice 2012, no. 1 (2012): 198789.
  7. Nikolovski, Janeta, Georgios N. Stamatas, Nikiforos Kollias, and Benjamin C. Wiegand. “Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 128, no. 7 (2008): 1728-1736.
  8. Hoeger, Peter H., and Christine C. Enzmann. “Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy.” Pediatric dermatology 19, no. 3 (2002): 256-262.
  9. Darmstadt, Gary L., Samir K. Saha, ASM Nawshad Uddin Ahmed, MAK Azad Chowdhury, Paul A. Law, Saifuddin Ahmed, Muhammad Asif Alam, Robert E. Black, and Mathuram Santosham. “Effect of topical treatment with skin barrier-enhancing emollients on nosocomial infections in preterm infants in Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial.” The Lancet 365, no. 9464 (2005): 1039-1045.
  10. Schmitt, J., A. Buske-Kirschbaum, and V. Roessner. “Is atopic disease a risk factor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? A systematic review.” Allergy 65, no. 12 (2010): 1506-1524.
  11. Bowe, Whitney P., and Alan C. Logan. “Acne vulgaris, probiotics and the gut-brain-skin axis-back to the future?.” Gut pathogens 3, no. 1 (2011): 1.
  12. Salem, Iman, Amy Ramser, Nancy Isham, and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum. “The gut microbiome as a major regulator of the gut-skin axis.” Frontiers in microbiology 9 (2018): 382698.
  13. Grunau, Ruth E., Michael F. Whitfield, Julianne Petrie-Thomas, Anne R. Synnes, Ivan L. Cepeda, Adi Keidar, Marilyn Rogers, Margot MacKay, Philippa Hubber-Richard, and Debra Johannesen. “Neonatal pain, parenting stress and interaction, in relation to cognitive and motor development at 8 and 18 months in preterm infants.” Pain 143, no. 1-2 (2009): 138-146.
  14. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low birth weight infant. World Health Organization, 2022.
  15. Simpson, Eric L., Joanne R. Chalmers, Jon M. Hanifin, Kim S. Thomas, Michael J. Cork, WH Irwin McLean, Sara J. Brown, Zunqiu Chen, Yiyi Chen, and Hywel C. Williams. “Emollient enhancement of the skin barrier from birth offers effective atopic dermatitis prevention.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 134, no. 4 (2014): 818-823.
  16. Kelleher, Maeve M., Suzie Cro, Eleanor Van Vogt, Victoria Cornelius, Karin C. Lodrup Carlsen, Håvard Ove Skjerven, Eva Maria Rehbinder et al. “Skincare interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy: a cochrane systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.” Clinical & Experimental Allergy 51, no. 3 (2021): 402-418.
  17. Garcia Bartels, Natalie, Ramona Scheufele, Franziska Prosch, Tania Schink, Hans Proquitté, Roland R. Wauer, and Ulrike Blume-Peytavi. “Effect of standardized skin care regimens on neonatal skin barrier function in different body areas.” Pediatric dermatology 27, no. 1 (2010): 1-8.
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). Postnatal Care of the Mother and Newborn. World Health Organization; 2013.
  19. Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN). Neonatal Skin Care: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. 4th ed. 2018.
  20. Blume-Peytavi, Ulrike, Matthias Hauser, Georgios N. Stamatas, Delano Pathirana, and Natalie Garcia Bartels. “Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practices.” Pediatric dermatology 29, no. 1 (2012): 1-14.
  21. Perrett, Kirsten P., and Rachel L. Peters. “Emollients for prevention of atopic dermatitis in infancy.” The Lancet 395, no. 10228 (2020): 923-924.
  22. Kupkina, Anna, and Olena Mozyrska. “Skin care interventions and early complementary food introduction for the prevention of atopic dermatitis in infants.” (2023).
  23. Kelleher, Maeve M., Rachel Phillips, Sara J. Brown, Suzie Cro, Victoria Cornelius, Karin C. Lødrup Carlsen, Håvard O. Skjerven et al. “Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11 (2022).
  24. Edwards, William H., Jeanette M. Conner, Roger F. Soll, and Vermont Oxford Network Neonatal Skin Care Study Group. “The effect of prophylactic ointment therapy on nosocomial sepsis rates and skin integrity in infants with birth weights of 501 to 1000 g.” Pediatrics 113, no. 5 (2004): 1195-1203.
  25. Salam, Rehana A., Jai K. Das, Gary L. Darmstadt, and Zulfiqar A. Bhutta. “Emollient therapy for preterm newborn infants–evidence from the developing world.” BMC Public Health 13, no. Suppl 3 (2013): S31.
  26. Darmstadt, Gary L., Nadia Badrawi, Paul A. Law, Saifuddin Ahmed, Moataza Bashir, Iman Iskander, Dalia Al Said et al. “Topically applied sunflower seed oil prevents invasive bacterial infections in preterm infants in Egypt: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.” The Pediatric infectious disease journal 23, no. 8 (2004): 719-725
  27. Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, Ursula, Cindy Berger, and Romy Inzinger. “The effect of daily treatment with an olive oil/lanolin emollient on skin integrity in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.” Pediatric dermatology 25, no. 2 (2008): 174-178.
  28. Product, By, Shop All, By Benefit, Hair Care, and Product Transparency. “How to Oil Pull with Castor Oil for Clearer-looking Skin.”
  29. Purnamawati, Schandra, Niken Indrastuti, Retno Danarti, and Tatan Saefudin. “The role of moisturizers in addressing various kinds of dermatitis: a review.” Clinical medicine & research 15, no. 3-4 (2018): 75-87.
  30. Mawazi, Saeid Mezail, Jo Ann, Noordin Othman, Jiyauddin Khan, Sultan Othman Alolayan, Sultan S. Al thagfan, and Mohammed Kaleemullah. “A review of moisturizers; history, preparation, characterization and applications.” Cosmetics 9, no. 3 (2022): 61.
  31. Purnamawati, Schandra, Niken Indrastuti, Retno Danarti, and Tatan Saefudin. “The role of moisturizers in addressing various kinds of dermatitis: a review.” Clinical medicine & research 15, no. 3-4 (2018): 75-87.
  32. Schild, Jennifer, Aneta Kalvodová, Jarmila Zbytovská, Mike Farwick, and Cornelia Pyko. “The role of ceramides in skin barrier function and the importance of their correct formulation for skincare applications.” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 46, no. 4 (2024): 526-543.
  33. Li, Qingyang, Hui Fang, Erle Dang, and Gang Wang. “The role of ceramides in skin homeostasis and inflammatory skin diseases.” Journal of dermatological science 97, no. 1 (2020): 2-8.
  34. Zhang, Jiayi, Xintian Xu, Xiaopan Wang, Li Zhang, Mengyan Hu, Yunchen Le, Lihong Chen, and Jie Zheng. “Topical emollient prevents the development of atopic dermatitis and atopic march in mice.” Experimental Dermatology 32, no. 7 (2023): 1007-1015.
  35. Ghadially, Ruby, Lars Halkier-Sorensen, and Peter M. Elias. “Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 26, no. 3 (1992): 387-396.
  36. Arora, Jyoti, Ajay Kumar, and Siddharth Ramji. “Effect of oil massage on growth and neurobehavior in very low birth weight preterm neonates.” Indian pediatrics 42, no. 11 (2005): 1092.
  37. Danby, Simon G., Tareq AlEnezi, Amani Sultan, Tina Lavender, John Chittock, Kirsty Brown, and Michael J. Cork. “Effect of olive and sunflower seed oil on the adult skin barrier: implications for neonatal skin care.” Pediatric dermatology 30, no. 1 (2013): 42-50.
  38. Cooke, Alison, Michael J. Cork, Suresh Victor, Malcolm Campbell, Simon Danby, John Chittock, and Tina Lavender. “Olive oil, sunflower oil or no oil for baby dry skin or massage: a pilot, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial (the Oil in Baby SkincaRE [OBSeRvE] Study).” Acta Dermato-Venereologica 96, no. 3 (2016): 323-330.
  39. Sankaranarayanan, K., J. A. Mondkar, M. M. Chauhan, B. M. Mascarenhas, A. R. Mainkar, and R. Y. Salvi. “Oil massage in neonates: an open randomized controlled study of coconut versus mineral oil.” Indian pediatrics 42, no. 9 (2005): 877.
  40. Darmstadt, Gary L., M. Mao-Qiang, E. Chi, S. K. Saha, V. A. Ziboh, R. E. Black, M. Santosham, and P. M. Elias. “Impact of topical oils on the skin barrier: possible implications for neonatal health in developing countries.” Acta Paediatrica 91, no. 5 (2002): 546-554.
  41. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) [Internet]. Lanolin. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK501842/.
  42. Pigatto, Paolo, Alberto Martelli, Chiara Marsili, and Alessandro Fiocchi. “Contact dermatitis in children.” Italian journal of pediatrics 36, no. 1 (2010): 2.
  43. Sanchez-Prado, Lucia, Gerardo Alvarez-Rivera, J. Pablo Lamas, Maria Llompart, Marta Lores, and Carmen Garcia-Jares. “Content of suspected allergens and preservatives in marketed baby and child care products.” Analytical Methods 5, no. 2 (2013): 416-427.
  44. Lv, C., J. Hou, W. Xie, and H. Cheng. “Investigation on formaldehyde release from preservatives in cosmetics.” International journal of cosmetic science 37, no. 5 (2015): 474-478.
  45. Leoty-Okombi, Sabrina, Florence Gillaizeau, Sébastien Leuillet, Benoit Douillard, Sophie Le Fresne-Languille, Thomas Carton, Alessandra De Martino, Philippe Moussou, Catherine Bonnaud-Rosaye, and Valérie André. “Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) applied as a patch on human skin physiology and its microbiota.” Cosmetics 8, no. 1 (2021): 6.
  46. Lund, Carolyn H., Jason W. Osborne, Joanne Kuller, Alfred T. Lane, Judy Wright Lott, and Deborah A. Raines. “Neonatal skin care: Clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence- based clinical practice guideline.” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 30, no. 1 (2001): 41-51.
  47. Cleminson, Jemma, and William McGuire. “Topical emollient for preventing infection in preterm infants.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1 (2016).
  48. Kusari, Ayan, Allison M. Han, Cesar A. Virgen, Catalina Matiz, Maynard Rasmussen, Sheila F. Friedlander, and Dawn Z. Eichenfield. “Evidence-based skin care in preterm infants.” Pediatric dermatology 36, no. 1 (2019): 16-23.
  49. Hoeger, Peter H., and Christine C. Enzmann. “Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy.” Pediatric dermatology 19, no. 3 (2002): 256-262.
  50. Hoeger, Peter H., and Christine C. Enzmann. “Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy.” Pediatric dermatology 19, no. 3 (2002): 256-262.
  51. Dréno, Brigitte, Marie Ange Dagnelie, Amir Khammari, and Stéphane Corvec. “The skin microbiome: a new actor in inflammatory acne.” American journal of clinical dermatology 21, no. Suppl 1 (2020): 18-24.
  52. Choi, Eung Ho. “Skin barrier function in neonates and infants.” Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 17, no. 1 (2025): 32.

Become an Editorial Board Member

Become a Reviewer

What our clients say

MEDIRES PUBLISHING

At our organization, we prioritize excellence in supporting the endeavors of researchers and practitioners alike. With a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, our journals eagerly accept various article types, including but not limited to Research Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Mini-Reviews, Opinions, and Letters to the Editor.

This approach ensures a rich tapestry of scholarly contributions, fostering an environment ripe for intellectual exchange and advancement."

Contact Info

MEDIRES PUBLISHING LLC,
447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Suite #1734,
New York, 10013, United States.
Phone: +1 (786) 490-6788
WhatsApp us: WhatsApp - Medires Online
Email: info@mediresonline.org